“Skyfall” and Bones
A couple days ago, Russia announced the successful launch of a new kind of missile:
NATO immediately gave a name to the new missile, and calls it Skyfall. This is appropriate, as the end of days would be upon the world, if the missile went into actual use.
We note that Trump is in Asia this week, as resolving the Korean War and China are critical to the balancing of the world. A’s family history and assets sit at the center of it all. Thus while Trump can make headway, he ultimately cannot really solve anything.
Perhaps unexpectedly to Americans, is that A is also central to the Ukraine matter. Why, are the reasons less obvious than the ones of the Korean War and China.
The reason is that Russia is of central importance to A, including as the keeper of the true history of Kiev. Without Russia, there is no Kiev.
Furthermore, and perhaps more importantly, there is no Russia without its current leader. This is perhaps a bolder statement than the first. However is this true, because just like Korea cannot resolve without A, Russia cannot resolve with its President.
Resolve, because Russia sits at the unique singular position of being neither fully West nor fully East. Without its current leader, the one recognizing the same, Russia would eventually succumb to one of the Western powers, e.g., England which has been attempting to control Russia for nearly 5 centuries.
Conversely, Russia would succumb to becoming completely the East. Not in the generation of President Xi Jinping, but some future generation with a leader installed by the West. China would then be used as proxy to try overtake Russia. In return, the West would be given, Kiev. Either scenario would be the road to WW3.
Thus does the current leader of Russia, as no other before, capture not only Russia, but a moment.
A finds singular meaning in that fact. For this, has she framed the matter as TWO SEATS, but also, ONE MAN, ONE WOMAN.
This is described in the last blogpost here titled “A ballroom in DC, and stolen jewels in Paris.” There A wrote:
“That other seat, in addition to hers, is foundational to the moving-forward of the world. Without that seat filled, is A uninterested in offering Washington her constructed solution, or being in Washington at all.
The person for whom A is not interested in jewels, crowns, palaces or any of the accoutrements with which we associate royalty. A, the American from a history and provenance that makes any construction at the White House, or for that matter London or Paris, look like tinseltown. “
https://www.rosehouse.org/updates-news/a-ballroom-in-dc-and-stolen-jewels-in-paris
That was posted on 10/22.
On 10/25, Kamala Harris announced she might be running for President again, saying politics is “in her bones.”
The phrase was intended as a slight dig against A, to suggest that A has in her bones instead, gardening and roses and more so, Russia.
In a way this is correct, just as it is correct that A has in her bones the history and geopolitical assets, without which the world cannot move forward. More so, because A will not move forward without the other person, to fill the other seat.
The person who, as A would describe it, has something more than “bones” per se, but the indefinable matter in his bones nonetheless, which is Destiny.
Destiny, pre-written by a definition of bones by way of earth and mud and soil and stars, from the beginning. For Russia to take its true and central place in the world, and therefore, the world. More so, in the great balancing of the world, impossible without Russia.
The person of Russia, the one leading Russia now, without which — missiles or not — the sky would fall anyhow.
How A knows that, how one person could be so centrally important, is something A simply knows. How she knows, you could say, is in her bones.
Why, because A is one of those persons too. The person without which, the world cannot move forward. Why would she choose, in another person, anyone less?